Starter
For your first email program.
$192 billed yearly.
20,000 emails / month
Choose Starter- 5 brands · 3 seats
- 5 custom sending domains
- 500 email verifications/month
- $1.50 / 1,000 extra emails
Which email testing tools an AI agent in Claude, Cursor or Codex can drive, and which job each one does: catching mail in development, or checking the real message before it goes out.
Mailtrap is the best email testing API for an AI agent. Its official MCP server, mcp-mailtrap, lets Claude, Cursor or Codex send to a Mailtrap sandbox inbox and read back the content, headers, attachments and spam score of what arrived, with nothing delivered to a real person (checked October 1, 2026). Nitrosend does the other half of the job. It has no capture inbox, but an agent working in Nitrosend can preview a campaign or flow, send a test of that exact version to addresses you choose, and approve the send once you confirm it. To do that from an AI agent, add Nitrosend's MCP server at https://api.nitrosend.com/mcp to Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or Codex and sign in with OAuth (setup for each assistant).
Development capture intercepts outgoing mail so it never reaches a real person, and lets you inspect the rendered HTML and assert on it in integration tests. Pre-send verification takes the email you are actually about to send and checks whether it is ready to reach an inbox, with seed mailboxes, spam scoring, authentication checks or test sends, depending on the tool.
Nitrosend publishes this page. It ranks the two jobs separately and says where Nitrosend is not the answer.
You need a fake SMTP server that swallows everything, an inbox UI, and an API so integration tests can fetch the message and assert on it.
| Tool | Fake SMTP | API for assertions | Self-hosted | Free tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mailtrap | Yes | Yes | Mailtrap Local | Yes |
| Mailpit | Yes | Yes | Yes | Open source |
| MailHog | Yes | Yes | Yes | Open source |
| MailSlurp | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Ethereal | Yes | Limited | No | Yes |
Mailtrap is the best managed option and the category leader: a real inbox UI, an API for test assertions, team sharing and a SpamAssassin score and blacklist report on captured messages. It also ships Mailtrap Local, a free, open-source single binary that captures mail on your own machine, and Mailtrap's own docs pitch it for catching unintended emails from local AI agents. Mailpit is the best self-hosted choice: a single static binary with a REST API for integration testing, still shipping releases (v1.31.3 on September 27, 2026), and the successor to MailHog, which has not had a release since v1.0.1 in August 2020. MailSlurp is the pick when tests need real addresses you can send to, receive at and inspect through an API. Ethereal is a free fake SMTP service you read back over IMAP or POP3 rather than a REST API, which is why its API is marked limited.
For an agent, the shape of the free plan matters more than the price. Mailtrap's free Sandbox plan is 50 test emails a month in one sandbox that holds 10 emails, and an agent that resends after every edit can use that up in one sitting. A local capture binary such as Mailpit or Mailtrap Local has no monthly quota, which suits an agent iterating on a template.
Nitrosend does not offer a capture inbox and is not a candidate for this job. If development capture is what you searched for, use Mailtrap or Mailpit and stop reading here.
This is the job a capture inbox cannot do, because a fake SMTP server accepts everything. It tells you your code works. It tells you nothing about placement.
| Tool | Real seed mailboxes | Spam scoring | Auth checks | Inside your sending platform |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrosend Inside your sending platform | Test sends to addresses you choose | Content check at approval | Yes | Yes |
| GlockApps | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mail-Tester | Single seed | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mailtrap | No | Yes | No | No |
Best for: verifying the exact message you are about to send, from the platform that will send it.
Before a send, your AI agent can open a preview, send a test to addresses you choose, and approve the send once you confirm it, and approval checks the content and preflight readiness first. For a seed-mailbox placement test, pair it with a placement tool such as GlockApps.
Around that sit dry_run validation and preflight checks covering domain verification, sender configuration, audience validity and content compliance, plus a test send before any real send.
A test with blank merge fields hides a classic personalization bug, a greeting that renders as "Hi ,". A Nitrosend test send can take sample values for each merge field, or borrow a real contact's data while delivering only to your test address (sample_contact_id in the API). For a flow, the test is of one exact, unchangeable revision, and approval can name that revision as a check that the draft has not changed since, so an edit made after the test does not go out untested.
Test sends emit no webhook events, so a test never fires your webhook handler. To check a webhook handler, send a signed test event instead with POST /v1/my/webhooks/{id}/test, which arrives marked "test": true (webhooks docs).
The structural advantage is that the test runs inside the system that will do the sending, with the same authentication and reputation once your sending domain is set up. An external tester is always testing an approximation.
Where Nitrosend is not the answer: development capture, as above. It has no fake SMTP server, so it cannot intercept your application's outgoing mail in a test suite. Pair it with Mailpit or Mailtrap for that half.
Best for: a dedicated placement test with blocklist and DMARC monitoring alongside.
Its spam test shows placement across Gmail, Yahoo, AOL and Outlook, scores the message against SpamAssassin, checks the sending IP against 50+ blocklists and verifies SPF, DKIM and DMARC, with DMARC analytics and uptime monitoring on the same plans. Two tests are free, then it is a paid plan. It sits outside your sending platform, which means an extra integration and a slightly different sending path from production.
Best for: a free, quick sanity check.
Send one email to a generated address and get a score with a breakdown of authentication, spam-filter triggers and formatting, with three free tests in any 24 hours. It is a single mailbox rather than a seed pool, so it is a smoke test rather than a placement test, and it is useful at that.
Two things in its own FAQ matter before an agent leans on it. The score comes from a vanilla SpamAssassin install, and a perfect score can still land in spam because every filter works differently and adapts to each person. And a result is visible to anyone holding the test address for 7 days, so send it a sample, never a real customer's receipt or a live password-reset link. For how Gmail itself rates your domain, use Postmaster Tools, which reports spam rate, reputation, authentication and delivery errors for mail to personal Gmail accounts. See the mail tester guide.
Appears in both halves. Its spam score and blacklist report on captured messages are a reasonable pre-send signal, though without real seed mailboxes it cannot report actual placement.
Most teams do step one and step five and skip the middle, which is why the first big campaign is usually the one that teaches them about inbox placement.
Nitrosend fits the check before a real send. Describe the send to your AI agent, and the preview, test send and approval check run inside the same MCP-driven flow before the real message goes out, with no separate testing tool bolted on afterward. For capture in development the agent still needs Mailtrap or Mailpit. Because Nitrosend is a listed plugin in the ChatGPT plugin directory, that same verification loop works from ChatGPT directly, not only from a dashboard.
What is the best API for email testing?
Mailtrap or Mailpit for catching mail in development. Nitrosend for checking the exact message you are about to send, with a preview, test sends to addresses you choose and an approval step, inside the platform that will send it. They are complementary rather than competing.
Can Claude or Cursor test emails through an API?
Yes. Mailtrap's official MCP server, mcp-mailtrap, lets an agent send to a sandbox inbox and inspect what arrived, including headers and spam score. Nitrosend's MCP server, added at https://api.nitrosend.com/mcp with an OAuth sign-in, gives an agent a preview, a test send to addresses you choose and an approval step before the real message goes out, but it has no capture inbox.
Can I test emails without sending them?
Yes, with a capture tool like Mailpit, Mailtrap Local or Mailtrap, which intercepts mail at the SMTP layer. That validates code and rendering but cannot tell you anything about deliverability.
What is a seed list?
A set of real mailboxes across major providers that you send a test to, so you can see where the message actually landed. It is the closest a test gets to measuring inbox placement, though filters that adapt to each person make a seed result a sample rather than a guarantee.
Is Mailtrap free?
Its Sandbox has a free plan of 50 test emails a month in one sandbox, and Mailtrap Local is free and open source. Mailpit and MailHog are open source and free to self-host.
How do I test a campaign on Nitrosend before it goes out?
Run the preflight checks, which cover domain verification, sender configuration, audience validity and content compliance, then send a test to addresses you choose, with sample merge-field values or a real contact's data, and approve the send, which checks content and preflight readiness first. Both run against the real sending domain.
Every plan includes full stack emailing: Flows, Newsletter Campaigns and Transactional Email, plus our NitroWheel LLM and all agent integrations (Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Cursor and others). Pay for what you send, not who you store.
Every paid plan includes 3 agent inboxes and no Nitrosend footer.
For your first email program.
$192 billed yearly.
20,000 emails / month
Choose StarterFor a growing audience.
$480 billed yearly.
60,000 emails / month
Choose ProFor teams and agencies.
$1,440 billed yearly.
200,000 emails / month
Choose GrowthFor high-volume sending.
$2,880 billed yearly.
500,000 emails / month
Choose ScaleSending 500,000+ emails a month? Get a custom plan designed for you, with volume pricing for sending, verification and enrichment.
5,000 emails to start, then 500 emails every month. No expiry on your starter emails.
Daily allowances depend on your plan and sender standing. Strong list, domain and delivery evidence can raise standing, including on day one. Trusted receives the full plan allowance; available email credits, safety checks and delivery pacing still apply.
Free forever. No credit card required. See full comparison →